다음은 이 유권자의 답변과 비교한 귀하의 답변입니다.
선거 › 입후보자의 투명성
H>H 개인 답변아니오, 공개한다면 더욱 존중하는 마음이 들겠지만 반드시 공개할 필요는 없습니다. |
경제 › 세금
H>H 개인 답변Reform to a flat tax, or a flat tax for income after poverty level, and raise poverty level to the amount of money needed for a reasonable standard of living for someone with average financial literacy. Teach financial literacy in school. The lowest income I can consistently find people online living comfortably with is $7k, with some DIY skills. |
환경 › 플라스틱 제품 금지
H>H 개인 답변아니요, 하지만 생분해성 제품을 만드는 회사들을 위한 조세 인센티브는 늘려야 합니다 |
이민 › 시민권 시험
H>H 개인 답변예. 그러나 아주 기본적이고 단순한 주제만 다뤄야 합니다 |
과학 › 핵 에너지
H>H 개인 답변Yes, measures have been taken so it is now one of the safest sources of energy. |
외교 정책 › 외국 선거
H>H 개인 답변예, 그러나 전제 정치적 통치자에 의한 인권 침해로부터 국가를 보호하기 위해서입니다. |
범죄 › 범죄자의 투표권
H>H 개인 답변Yes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation. Until then, they have forfeited their rights by breaking the law, and should not be allowed to vote if they are willing to hurt the country like that. |
사회적 › 직장에서의 성 다양성
H>H 개인 답변아니요, 이사회 임원은 성별과 관계 없이 최고 적임자가 맡아야 합니다 |
보건 › 집에서 주문
H>H 개인 답변No, but people who know they have coronavirus should be required to stay at home, be given extra assistance if needed, and be charged for negligent manslaughter or something similar if they disobey and it results in someone's death. |
경제 › 최저임금
H>H 개인 답변Yes, make it a living wage and adjust it according to inflation regularly enough to keep it a living wage. Perhaps enough to make $24k a year when working full time. I've heard of many people happily living on $7k per year despite having much more (even being rich). However, this does require some time to aquire skills for DIY. So $24k may be more reasonable for people without those skills. |
사회적 › 트랜스젠더 운동 선수
H>H 개인 답변아니요, 선수들은 출생 증명서에 등재 된 생물학적성에 근거하여 경쟁해야합니다 |
국내 정채 › 임기 제한
H>H 개인 답변Whatever the Constitution says. It is an inspired document for our government. |
국내 정채 › 의약품 정책
H>H 개인 답변No, we should not decriminalize drugs, except under supervision of a medical professional, and we should I clude mental health education in schools to teach alternatives to calming yourself with drugs like marijuana. |
선거 › 선거자금 조달
H>H 개인 답변아니요, 하지만 노조 및 비영리 단체로부터의 기부를 허용합니다 |
환경 › 동물 실험
H>H 개인 답변네,하지만 화장품은 아닙니다. |
범죄 › 개인 교도소
H>H 개인 답변Yes, but prisons should be standardized and reformed according to available research on reforming prisoners. |
국내 정채 › 소셜 미디어의 정치 광고
H>H 개인 답변No, but they should not tailor the political advertising to only show to people who agree with it. This will increase political polarization and lead to war. |
외교 정책 › 외국 원조
H>H 개인 답변Decrease as much as needed to prioritize our own needs. We don't want to be so stretched thin that we are easy pickings. |
사회적 › 낙태
H>H 개인 답변Pro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child. These quotes from Mother Teresa sum up my feelings about it: "Please don't kill the child. I want the child. Please give me the child. I am willing to accept any child who would be aborted, and to give that child to a married couple who will love the child, and be loved by the child." "Any country that accepts abortion, is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what it wants." "It is a poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live as you wish." "The so-called right to abortion [...] has portrayed the greatest of gifts -- a child -- as a competitor, an intrusion, and an inconvenience. It has nominally accorded mothers unfettered dominion over the independent lives of their physically dependent sons and daughters" And, in granting this unconscionable power, it has exposed many women to unjust and selfish demands from their husbands or other sexual partners. Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign." "But I feel that the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child - a direct killing of the innocent child - murder by the mother herself. And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another? How do we persuade a woman not to have an abortion? As always, we must persuade her with love, and we remind ourselves that love means to be willing to give until it hurts. Jesus gave even his life to love us. So the mother who is thinking of abortion, should be helped to love - that is, to give until it hurts her plans, or her free time, to respect the life of her child. The father of that child, whoever he is, must also give until it hurts." |
외교 정책 › 군비
H>H 개인 답변Increase, and better prioritize mental health. Often, military members' psychiatrists are told not to diagnose them with conditions they have, because then the government would be required to pay to help them with the disorder, and the budget isn't big enough for that. |
범죄 › 교도소 과잉 수용
H>H 개인 답변No, this violates the Amendment about doing trial twice.They should keep the sentence they got. But I approve of alternatives such as house arrest, and I certainly approve of training community service, given there are no opportunities for child abuse, stealing, etc. |
선거 › 최소 투표연령
H>H 개인 답변No. I believe that the writers of the Constitution were divinely inspired (I'm a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints). I personally believe (not a church opinion or anything. My own) that the reason they said only land-owning men should vote was to prevent the uneducated from making bad voting decisions. While I believe that women and non-property owners should be allowed to vote, I think it is wise to find a way to preserve the original intent. So perhaps voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote. This should NOT include calling certain OPINIONS right or wrong. |
경제 › 주 소유권
H>H 개인 답변That is fine, but the government should never be the majority stakeholder |
보건 › 단일 보험자 건강보험
H>H 개인 답변Yes, but people should be allowed to opt out. |
다음은 인기 있는 정치적 주제에 대해 이 유권자와 비교하는 방법입니다.
가장 많은 중요한 순위에있는 1 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 3 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 1 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 3 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 5 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 4 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 5 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 4 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 3 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 5 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 5 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
다음은 전통적인 이념적 축에서 이 유권자와 비교하는 방법입니다.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. 판권 소유. 이 사이트를 사용하면 당사의 사용자 계약 및 개인 정보 보호 정책 에 동의하는 것으로 간주됩니다. iSideWith.com은 소매업체와의 제휴 파트너십의 일환으로 당사 사이트를 통해 구매한 제품에서 판매의 일부를 얻을 수 있습니다. iSideWith.com의 사전 서면 승인 없이는 이 사이트의 자료를 복제, 배포, 전송, 캐시 또는 기타 방식으로 사용할 수 없습니다.