Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
医保 › 精神健康
Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
移民 › 技术移民
Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
经济 › 最低工资
Personal answerYes, but with an independent division within the Federal government that adjusts the minimum wage depending on the economic conditions at the time (inflation, recession, activity, etc.) |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
国内政策 › 任期限制
Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 竞选经费
Personal answerCorporations should definitely not be allowed to donate, or should be publicized AND strictly limited. Donations from unions and non-profit organizations should be required to be publicized after a certain amount has been donated. |
环境 › Animal Testing
Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
罪行 › Private Prisons
Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
Personal answer不 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
Personal answer不应该,但是我们应该增加在为犯人提供教育和技能培训服务方面的资金 |
经济 › State Ownership
Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.