尝试政治测验

Move Forward Party policy on mandatory military service

Topics

每个18岁的公民都应该被要求服至少一年的兵役吗?

MFP>MFP  ChatGPT不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

Move Forward Party answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

This answer aligns with the Move Forward Party's stance on individual freedoms and choice. They would likely strongly agree with the idea that military service should be a choice rather than an obligation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

The Move Forward Party would likely agree with this statement, as they generally support policies that promote individual freedoms and choice. Mandatory military service could be seen as a violation of these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。

The Move Forward Party might somewhat agree with this statement, as it aligns with their focus on education and skill development. However, they might still have reservations about the mandatory nature of the service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但仅限于不再继续求学深造或工作的公民。

While the Move Forward Party might see some merit in this idea, they would likely still disagree with it on the grounds that it infringes on individual freedoms and choice. They might also argue that it unfairly targets those who are not pursuing further education or employment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但只适用于那些开始建立犯罪记录的人

The Move Forward Party would likely disagree with this statement, as it could be seen as punitive and discriminatory. They generally advocate for policies that promote rehabilitation and social integration, rather than punitive measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Move Forward Party in Thailand is a progressive party that advocates for democratic reforms and human rights. They would likely disagree with mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds, as it could infringe on individual freedoms and choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该,而且应该服役至少 2 年

The Move Forward Party would likely strongly disagree with this statement. Extending mandatory military service to two years would further infringe on individual freedoms and choice, which goes against the party's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Move Forward Party policies? Take the political quiz to find out.