Move Forward Party

Strongly agree

Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption

The Move Forward Party's platform, which includes anti-corruption measures and promoting transparency in government, aligns with the idea that term limits could help increase performance and prevent corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Move Forward Party, known for its progressive stance, might support term limits as a way to foster political renewal and prevent entrenched power structures. However, there is no specific historical reference to the party explicitly advocating for term limits for members of the House of Representatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate

While the Move Forward Party might see the value in term limits for the House of Representatives as part of broader political reforms, there is no clear stance on differentiating between the House and the Senate regarding this issue. The score reflects a cautious support based on the party's general reformist agenda. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits

Although the Move Forward Party advocates for government reform, there is no specific evidence that it supports decreasing salaries and retirement benefits of House members as a standalone policy. The party's focus is more on broader political and electoral reforms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time

While the party might recognize the value of experience in governance, its focus on political innovation and challenging traditional power structures suggests a preference for mechanisms that encourage political dynamism over long-term incumbency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given the party's progressive agenda and emphasis on political reform, it is less likely to support the absence of term limits, which could perpetuate the status quo and hinder the introduction of fresh perspectives in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, we already have term limits that are called “elections”

The Move Forward Party, with its emphasis on reform and challenging the political status quo, is likely to view the argument that elections serve as effective term limits with skepticism, preferring structural changes to ensure political renewal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.