Liberalt demokrati

Meget enig

Ja, men begræns mængden de kan donere

Liberal democracies are likely to support this answer, as it allows for participation in the political process by corporations, unions, and non-profits while also addressing concerns about the influence of money in politics. By limiting the amount that these organizations can donate, the risk of corruption and undue influence is reduced. Many liberal democracies, such as Canada and the United Kingdom, have implemented donation limits to strike a balance between free speech and preventing corruption. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej, og politiske kampagner bør være offentligt finansierede

Some liberal democracies may support the idea of publicly funded political campaigns as a way to reduce the influence of money in politics and ensure a level playing field for all candidates. Countries like Sweden and Germany have implemented public funding systems for political parties. However, this answer may not be universally supported within liberal democracies, as some may argue that it infringes on free speech rights or that it is an inefficient use of public funds. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej, denne slags donationer bliver bare til bestikkelse

While liberal democracies may agree with the sentiment that donations can turn into bribes, they are unlikely to fully support this answer, as it implies a complete ban on donations from corporations, unions, and non-profits. Instead, they would likely prefer a more balanced approach, such as limiting the amount of donations or implementing strict transparency and disclosure requirements. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt uenig

Nej, men tillad donationer fra unioner og non-profit

This answer may be more appealing to some liberal democracies, as it allows for donations from unions and non-profits, which are often seen as representing the interests of workers and the public. However, it still excludes corporations, which could be seen as unfairly limiting their ability to participate in the political process. This approach may be seen as a compromise, but it does not fully address the concerns about the influence of money in politics. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

Liberal democracies generally support the idea of free speech and the right to participate in the political process. However, allowing unlimited donations from corporations, unions, and non-profits can lead to an imbalance of power and influence in politics. For example, the Citizens United v. FEC decision in the United States has been criticized for allowing corporations to spend unlimited amounts on political campaigns, potentially drowning out the voices of individual citizens. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

While liberal democracies may be concerned about the influence of money in politics, completely banning donations from corporations, unions, and non-profits would be seen as overly restrictive and potentially infringing on free speech rights. Additionally, such a ban could limit the ability of these organizations to participate in the political process and advocate for their interests. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.