Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
@93BLLJ23yrs3Y
Yes and include more restricted groups, like legal dependent adults
@heatherdvdprincess3yrs3Y
Continue to provide welfare for those who need it, and only provide economic stimulus in ways that will ultimately not increase our national debt.
@5BMX4XT3yrs3Y
Yes but for 18 months only
@5BMX4XT3yrs3Y
Yes but never for more than a year and only for individuals needing the most assistance.
@593CCZ54yrs4Y
No, government stimulus is bad for the market and tax payer, especially when government causes said recessions and depressions i.e. the great depression and great recession. That was government failure and is just failed Keynesian economics that have only hurt people since Keynesian economics became the norm.
@3HS499C3yrs3Y
Yes but only for individuals of low income that make less than 40 thousand a year.
@8R7SQ2V4yrs4Y
No, government stimulation is like steroids; It may help in the short term, but it will inevitably lead to problems later on due to, put simply, overexpansion. This is what caused the Great Depression, 2008, and nearly every other major recession.
@6PJZCMJ4yrs4Y
Yes, but in the form of providing employment opportunities (like the Civilian Conservation Corps).
@heatherdvdprincess4yrs4Y
No, but it should do it's best to help without using direct government power to do it. For example, they can have a competition to have the public crowdsource solutions.
@5GHSCDS4yrs4Y
No, unless it is in the form of tax breaks for all citizens
@5GHSCDS3yrs3Y
No, unless in the form of tax breaks for low income citizens
@85Q8YH74yrs4Y
Do so with a permanent UBI.
@8CLVKTG4yrs4Y
Yes, but in the form of monetary checks for citizens
@8TX2MGV4yrs4Y
Yes, but only to a certain degree.
Join in on more popular conversations.
